uusin ihmehärveli

Seuraa 
Viestejä45973
Liittynyt3.9.2015

eli videot ovat täälä
http://uk.youtube.com/user/speccy
ja jotain lehti juttua http://www.thestar.com/Business/article/300042

eli kyseinen masiina ei ole "overunity"vaan erittäin tehokas masiina

eli taas kommentia jos asia kiinnostaa

Kommentit (5)

Vierailija

Kyllä se vain väittää olevansa ikiliikkuja.

Keskeinen väite on se, että laite tuottaa tehoa, mutta ei aiheuta mitään vastusta sitä pyörittävälle koneelle, koska "back EMF" eli tehoa otettaessa sähkövirran aiheuttama vastakkaissuuntainen magneettikenttä ei pääse vaikuttamaan roottorin pyörintään.

Eli nyhjäistään energiaa tyhjästä.

ovolo
Seuraa 
Viestejä5370
Liittynyt7.7.2007
golbojob
eli videot ovat täälä
http://uk.youtube.com/user/speccy
ja jotain lehti juttua http://www.thestar.com/Business/article/300042

eli kyseinen masiina ei ole "overunity"vaan erittäin tehokas masiina

eli taas kommentia jos asia kiinnostaa




Sivulta: http://www.g9toengineering.com/backemf/ ... ration.htm

TOROID GENERATOR QUESTIONS
Answered by Texas A & M University( October 21, 2006)

Dear Mark,

It was nice to speak with you this morning. Thank you for your time.

We have 3 questions that we need answered please:

1) If you DO NOT have and induced back EMF - MMF acting against an approaching magnet according to Lenz’s Law and the Law of Conservation of Energy will you still induce an EMF in a coil of wire?

YES. You can have voltage but no current but you cannot have current but no voltage. A 12 volt battery is a good example where voltage exists but there is no current flowing. As soon as the battery is connected to something such as a light bulb you have current flowing in your circuit. So you have both voltage and current. If your battery reads 0 volts you will have 0 current if you hook it up to a light bulb.

When you have a current flowing in a wire you will have a magnetic field around the wire.

In a generator when a magnet approaches a coil of wire a voltage is induced in the wire BUT THE CURRENT IS NOT INDUCED AT THE SAME TIME AS THE VOLTAGE. In an inductor (the coil part of the generator) induced current lags induced voltage by 90 degrees. So if it takes 180 seconds for our magnet to approach our coil and induce a voltage that peaks at the 180 second mark - it will take 270 seconds for our current to peak (lagging by 90 seconds).

When current flows in a wire a magnetic field is created around the wire. The magnetic field is the part that pushes against our approaching magnet BUT from the above statement our current does not start flowing until 90 seconds after the voltage has begun to grow. EMF or voltage is the pressure that pushes “electricity” (electrons) through a wire and through a light bulb.

So the answer is yes we can have an EMF generated in a coil of wire without a magnetic field pushing against our approaching magnet in fact it happens all the time i.e. the 90 degree lag where the current follows the voltage

2) If you induce an EMF in a coil of wire without an induced back EMF - MMF acting against said wire, does this violate the Law of Conservation of Energy and Lenz’s Law?

YES. In a generator the Law of Conservation of Energy AND Lenz’s Law hinge solely on the fact that the induced magnetic field of the coil pushes against the approaching magnet.

3) If you DO have an induced back EMF - MMF and it is redirected out of the air gap and away from the rotor magnetic field and into secondary coils - will the secondary coil’s induced back emf - MMF aid the rotor flux entering the secondary coils?

YES. Once a magnetic field enters a metal core it will stay there up to the saturation point of the metal.

PART 5 - System Accelerates Under Load

A MAGNETICALLY COUPLED 8 armature generator which ACCELERATES under load in violation of Lenz’s Law and the Law of Conservation of Energy.

PART 6 - Induction Motor Acceleration with DC PM Field

A split-phase induction motor which is accelerated SOLELY by an externally applied stationary permanent magnetic field. The acceleration is accomplished by the magnetic coupling of the permanent magnet to the motor’s rotor. The acceleration is caused by the permanent magnet’s magnetomotive force adding to the rotor’s magnetomotive force and increasing the rotor’s torque coefficient. This external force has NO ENERGY COST associated with it and it violates the Work Energy Principle which states:

Thane C. Heins, President and CSO
Potential Difference Inc




Koko keksintö väärinkäsitysten varassa, yritetään saada energiaa ilman back EMF:ää.

Tulee mieleen Bruce de Palma, joka sai uppoamaan säästönsä Faradayn kiekon sovellukseen, nimeltään N-Machine, jonka myös piti jauhaa sähköä ilman back-EMF:ää.

Lainaus sivulta:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,626.0.html

N-machines do not work over 100 % efficiency.
This was all well worked out during the 80s and 90s.
I have visited Bruce de Palma in 1987 and had good cobntact with PSITRONICS,
who had tried all things and put 200.000 DM into machines and never got
over around 100 % with an error rate of +-5 %.

The Kinchelo report seems to be flawed. Also only incremental efficiencies are compared.
The brushes have a nonlinear resistance, that is why these reports are flawed or wrong conclusions
are drawn from it.

The N-machines are a "dead horse".

Regards, Stefan.

Vierailija

Avainlause tuossa on tämä: "BUT THE CURRENT IS NOT INDUCED AT THE SAME TIME AS THE VOLTAGE"

Tuossa sanotaan ihan selvällä englannilla että jännite ja virta ovat päinvastaisessa vaiheessa, joten kaavan P = UI tulokseksi tulee nolla. Tehoa ei synny.

Uusimmat

Suosituimmat