Climategate 2.0. Uudet vuodot. Samat hahmot. Uudet hupailut ilmastotieteilijöiden sanomisista. Taas tekemistä pimeiksi illoiksi. Popcornit esiin.
/// FOIA 2011 — Background and Context ///
“Over 2.5 billion people live on less than $2 a day.”
“Every day nearly 16.000 children die from hunger and related causes.”
“One dollar can save a life” — the opposite must also be true.
“Poverty is a death sentence.”
“Nations must invest $37 trillion in energy technologies by 2030 to stabilize
greenhouse gas emissions at sustainable levels.”
Today’s decisions should be based on all the information we can get, not on
hiding the decline.
This archive contains some 5.000 emails picked from keyword searches. A few
remarks and redactions are marked with triple brackets.
The rest, some 220.000, are encrypted for various reasons. We are not planning
to publicly release the passphrase.
We could not read every one, but tried to cover the most relevant topics such
Tällä palstalla on hupailtu moneen otteeseen ilmastouskonnon asian puolesta taistelevien tiedemiehien motiiveista. Climategate 2.0 paljastaa tiedemiesten ottaneen itse samat termistöt käyttöön:
// The Cause ///
By the way, when is Tom C going to formally publish his roughly 1500 year
reconstruction??? It would help the cause to be able to refer to that
reconstruction as confirming Mann and Jones, etc.
They will (see below) allow us to provide some discussion of the synthetic
example, referring to the J. Climate paper (which should be finally accepted
upon submission of the revised final draft), so that should help the cause a
I gave up on Judith Curry a while ago. I don’t know what she think’s she’s
doing, but its not helping the cause.
Jones harrastaa avoimmuutta IPCC:n AR5:n synnytysprosessissa:
“I’ve been told that IPCC is above national FOI Acts. One way to cover yourself and all those working in AR5 would be to delete all emails at the end of the
Jones on tyytyväinen adjusteeraustensa tuloksiin:
"This will reduce the 1940-1970 cooling in NH temps. Explaining the cooling with
sulphates won’t be quite as necessary."
Pientä epäilyä ilmastomallien toiminnasta - Barnett:
[IPCC AR5 models] clearly, some tuning or very good luck involved. I doubt the
modeling world will be able to get away with this much longer
Ja Jones samasta aiheesta:
"Basic problem is that all models are wrong – not got enough middle and low
Jones ritarina avoimmuuden puolesta:
"Any work we have done in the past is done on the back of the research grants we get – and has to be well hidden. I’ve discussed this with the main funder (US
Dept of Energy) in the past and they are happy about not releasing the original